I led a Leave No Trace (LNT) course for some teenaged trail
workers a few summers ago. LNT focuses its efforts on getting visitors to
public lands to visit as lightly as possible. I started the course by handing
out little plastic tags emblazoned with the 7 Principles of LNT. Smart-ass Kid
#1 raised his hand, “Um…like, these are plastic and we’re supposed to be
leaving no trace and like, protecting the environment, so why are you giving us
these?”
I was glad the kid asked. It made segueing into my personal queasiness about this somewhat twisted view of environmentalism a lot
easier. I would have felt dishonest not mentioning the double-standard of ethics inherent in that moment, and better to have the student ask the question than
for me to wail on and on like a disgruntled harpy.
It bothers me that we continue to separate woods and
not-woods worlds, and that we treat them so differently. I own an LNT instructional
DVD (came wrapped in plastic), several LNT stickers, three training manuals and
textbook type publications, and a pint glass—presumably to be used for drowning
my sorrows at the entire trinketry connected with leaving no trace. I think
that you can get water bottles, hats, t-shirts, fleeces, bumper stickers, and I
don’t care to know what else, all emblazoned with the logo. And I’m all for protecting public lands. I’m just equal
opportunity world protection. But it’s high time—as storms wash cartographic
distinctions away, as boundaries are eroded—that we stop pretending that
protection, that awareness can start and stop at the trailhead.
Despite everyone I know having a story of some hellacious
trip to the woods, I still think that most of the people who go to the woods
would agree that life is better there, or at least in a calmer, deeper key. “I went to the woods because I wished to
live deliberately,” wrote Thoreau. In part, I think that this is why anyone
goes to the woods. Life outside the woods, if we let it, becomes a maze of
expectations and requirements. It feels as if our lives and choices are no
longer our own. And so, when we can, if we are the people who must, we throw a
few things in a backpack and run away for the wild hills and hidden woods, for
deserts and oceans and jungles and any place beyond the bounds of normal life.
Almost without exception, my dearest friends are people who
have sought out and known wild places. I’ve lived with many of them in strange
little pocket communities tucked in among mountains and valleys and lakeshores.
I know that the wild places answer something deep within myself, and I suppose
that I take on faith that anyone else in the wilds, in these communities, has
something resonant at their core. I love these people faster because I
suspect our hearts are forged similarly. Perhaps our hearts and souls do not
always match exactly—and I know that the words I grasp at barely scratch the
surface of what I’m out there for—but there is a sense of “you and I, we are seeking and finding something similar out here in the wilds, beyond straight roads
and power lines and day planners.”
What I find in wildness is the closest truth I know to what
holiness might be. To have a sense that personal and sweet in common with a
stranger is beautiful.
And so, I’m friendlier to people I meet on mountaintops than
at subway stops because I think we’re similar. Also, perhaps, because I’m
meeting them in a place and in a way where I am at my best. This isn’t to say
that I fall in love with and befriend every stranger on every trail, or that I
don’t have bad days in the woods, or that I suddenly become an angel around
stunted balsam fir trees. But I am more likely to be kind in the woods. When I
start to get peeved at strangers in the woods, it helps to remember that there
is a sliver of commonality between them and me. And I hate them a little less,
humor them a little more. (Mostly.)
When I worked on a mountaintop summer camp in the White
Mountains, we read this Rene Daumal passage to campers before
they descended to their non-camp lives. The words remain in my bones: “You cannot stay on the summit forever; you have to come
down again. So why bother in the first place? Just this: What is above knows
what is below, but what is below does not know what is above. One climbs, one
sees. One descends, one sees no longer, but one has seen. There is an art of
conducting oneself in the lower regions by the memory of what one saw higher
up. When one can no longer see, one can at least still know.”
It is the art of conducting oneself that gets me. I’ve been
beyond lucky to have lived swaths of my life in wild places. I swear there is
something better out there than pursuing the normal American Dream of dangerous
and hollow consumption and the itching feeling of being controlled, and of
never being or having enough.
But now, I have descended from my woods and wilds. I live in
a city, although I doubt this is permanent. But, I am guided by the memory of
what I’ve seen as possible, of what I have known, and I find pieces of that
goodness here. I’d like to think that I put a little of that goodness into this
world, too. Something as a balm against the often frustrating pursuit of cultural
expectations, a wild force against the clutter and bad chaos and violence of the so-called civilized world.
In Macbeth, the three
witches prophesize that Macbeth will rule Scotland until Great Birnam Wood
comes to high Dunsinane Hill, where his castle sits. As forests are not noted
for their mobility, Macbeth assumes he is invincible and becomes a despotic
tyrant—the play is Shakespeare’s shortest and bloodiest. Heads are rolling left
and right, chimneys toppling, horses screaming, women and children slaughtered,
thunder, lightning, and Lady Macbeth loses her cookies over her part in
bringing on the horror. Never mind Denmark, shit is rotten and bloody and crazy
in Scotland.
The Thane of Ross has a great line, when the awesome Macduff
asks how Scotland is faring: “Alas! poor country, Almost afraid to know
itself.” So beaten down by the powerful that the country has almost forgotten
its strength. The key, I think, is the word “almost.”
Because, a few lines later—after learning that Macbeth slew
Lady Macduff and all the Macduff children—Macduff assembles an army and lead them up to Dunsinane Hill to kill Macbeth. Of course, as
camouflage, the army will cut down and carry the trees of Birnam Wood before
them.
To Macbeth, it looks as if the forest itself has revolted as
the army swarms up the hill. The trees arrive, bloodshed ensues, and Macduff relieves Macbeth of
his head.
Not a traditional ecological or world-saving text, I know.
But, if we could learn to be how we are in the woods, out of the woods, I
suspect that a lot of the pseudo-powerful forces that seem to control our lives
outside the woods would start to fall.
And so, we must try to live more deliberately, to plan and
prepare ourselves for what we may come across, to live with only what we need,
to be aware of our surroundings and our resources, to take time to do nothing
but seek our happiness, to be silent at times and to speak our minds at others, to see beauty, to be capable in and aware of our bodies and more self-reliant, and to be as kind to the strangers at the grocery store
as we would be with the strangers on the ridges. Those who have been to the
summits and descended, those who know the principles of living lightly on any
landscape, those who have hidden their hearts away in the woods, now is the
time to come forward and live those better ways that you know are possible. You might be happier, too. I hope so. The closer I pull my life here back to
the themes of life in woods, the happier I am. That I know.