Recently, I annoyed myself and likely others, with an
entirely accurate and extremely pompous statement that I wasn’t fully
comfortable, environmentally, with the thought of flying across the country for
a quick visit with friends. That’s a lot of carbon to spew into the atmosphere
for my own brief pleasure and convenience. And the unthinking ease of it all,
that one can flit around the globe in the span of a few hours and not be
amazed—just peeved about the lack of snacks—bothers me. This nonchalance bothers
me more, maybe, than the carbon molecules spewing out the jets, bonding
together again, thickening the atmosphere until the glaciers melt, sea levels
rise and seasons change unnaturally. It’s a tough call which sort of arrogance
is more irksome.
I’m not particularly pleased that an aversion to air travel
has come up as a sticking point in the patchwork of my ethics. For starters, it
turns me into a sort of smug-greenier-than-thou killjoy when friends—people I
dearly love and have not seen in far too long—begin to talk of reunions and
trips and travel. Secondly, it leaves me with a false dichotomy, weighing my
love for my people in distant places with the more esoteric love for the
planet. Truly, only one of side of that equation loves me back a fiercely as I
give, wraps arms around me, laughs with me, makes me feel like the world is
both should and will be saved.
It’s not a fair fight—it’s comparing apples to giraffes,
really. And it’s one that I try to not bring on myself. It’s not about if I
care about my distant people or not or how much. That is immeasurable. This new
hiccup comes from a deep disturbance in the unexamined means towards common
ends.
Part of this disinclination to fly comes from the fact I
earned Masters degree in the monetarily-unrewarding field of Environmental
Writing just as the economy tanked. For the last five years, I have been unable
to consider flying anywhere. Either I haven’t had to money to buy a plane
ticket, or I haven’t been able—either scheduling or dollar-wise—to take enough
time off from my cobbled part-time and seasonal jobs to go anywhere more than a
few hours drive away. Perhaps my growing discomfort with air travel is just
some gnawing form of Classist jealousy—because I haven’t been able to have X,
I’ve hastily built myself some convenient moral high ground about X being
foolish as a consolation, so my economically disadvantaged position is a
choice, rather than a personal failure. “Oh air planes and organic caviar?
They’re fine for silly things, but their richness really poisons the ambrosial purity of my rice, beans and
bicycle…”
I hope that I’m not that insecure or priggishly
sanctimonious, but it is a possibility.
Whatever, the reason, I’ve had a break from the mental
conditioning that one can—and maybe should
to be some semblance of an accomplished global citizen? —jet set around
frequently. And now, five years grounded, it just seems strange to not think of such things, to just buy a ticket and get
on a plane and be elsewhere a few hours later. What is the fuel efficiency of a
747, how much carbon, per passenger, does it emit per mile, where does the jet
fuel come from, and what are the labor and environmental standards of where
this fuel came from, and so on.
These are metric questions that can be easily answered with
some Google searching. But they aren’t, to me, the really interesting ones. I’m
interested in why we don’t ask those questions about almost anything that
literally fuels our very convenient lives. It is the convenience that troubles
me. That what was once a scientific miracle is now commonplace and dreaded as
drudgery with people spinning around the world for brief business meetings and
snappy international weekends and so on. It some how seems disrespectful of the
beauty and complexity between places, between people, of the science and wonder and mechanics of flight itself, to erase all that
distance so quickly. There was something about immigrants and pioneers, leaving
home and making fully new roots far away that we’ve lost—because it is so easy
to go from place to place, I wonder if we are always half-rooted between where
we are and where we’ve been.
Yet, there are things I have seen on the other sides of the
globe that have changed my understanding of how to be in this world more than I
would have ever learned if I’d never left Grover’s Corners. I wouldn’t have the
worldview I do without what I saw and did in New Zealand or Japan or Kenya or
Denmark. I wouldn’t know myself half so well without the trips I took to Oregon
or Montana or Mississippi or Colorado. I don’t begrudge the ethical, mental, emotional,
aesthetic benefits of traveling, and there are times when I almost believe that
the weight of carbon pollution from flights of fancy is nothing when compared
to eyes and a heart opened to all of the possibility witnessed in a different
place.
Almost. Because, really, how much of this wonderful world do
we each need or want or deserve to see before becoming willing to alter our
lives for its survival? Does recycling every week or owning a Prius or joining
a CSA or only shopping at thrift stores and Patagonia mean that you “earn” the
carbon points to flit off to Paris?
Of course not. Life doesn’t work like that. These are not
simple trades and numerical balances. We live in pulsing ecosystems and webs,
not algebraic equations or score cards. All I ask is that we begin to think
before we act, to believe that the benefit of what we do—in all things, not
just airports—is worth the cost. That we do not act casually and callously,
that we stop the dangerous cultural habit of being inured to wonder. That we
slow down and make choices, rather than be carried on the air currents as if we
had no agency in the matter.
And I don’t have an answer or a firm line that I hold. I may
fly to Montana to see my friends, I’ll certainly fly to visit my faraway sister
at some point, and there are beautiful places I would love to be in, to touch
and smell and be alive in. Here is what it comes down to, for me: Fossil fuel
is—basically—pressurized, refined extractions of previous life on this planet.
It is absolutely crazy to think that we’re all driving and flying around on the
carbonic memories of dinosaurs and primordial slime.
But we are. And that is entirely mind-boggling, and more
than a little sacred.
If I believe that what I am doing in a car, in an
airplane, unwrapping a plastic package, is somehow respectful of and furthering
the legacy of these lives that have gone before, then I’m okay with it all. It is an imperfect solution, and I am not in anyway
consistently pleased with my own abilities to follow through with this ideal.
Being aware and hopeful though, this is
the only start I know how to make.
(And I’m not a total Greench. I support people who can and choose to, respectfully and humbly, get
on airplanes flying to their loved ones for the winter holidays. It is cold and
it is dark and we hunger to be around people we love and who love us. I think
that dinosaurs would be okay with some seasonal migrations for love.)
i m fully agree with this
ReplyDelete