Robert Frost, with an incongruous tool of unity, but he's a poet so it'll make sense somehow. image from poemshape.wordpress.com |
Taylor Family lore is that Dad lulled my sisters and I to sleep as babies by explaining the tripartite system of Federal government. There is something to the idea of imagining us as fussy babies being swaddled up and held by a mustachioed man in a flannel shirt, talking about the differences between the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches of government, rather than cooing about good-night moons and Pat the Bunnies.
The nuances, of course, were lost on our young minds, but when the system of checks and balances, of the interconnecting functions of a working system of government are some of your bedtime stories, you grow up believing in justice, compromise, and the possibility of good governance. Thanks to Dad’s reverence for the system—and irreverence for many of the players—and Mom’s practical liberalism, my sisters and I all lean towards common sense, fairness, and Socialism. (That is, unless anyone is offering any of us the Executive Queenship.)
The nuances, of course, were lost on our young minds, but when the system of checks and balances, of the interconnecting functions of a working system of government are some of your bedtime stories, you grow up believing in justice, compromise, and the possibility of good governance. Thanks to Dad’s reverence for the system—and irreverence for many of the players—and Mom’s practical liberalism, my sisters and I all lean towards common sense, fairness, and Socialism. (That is, unless anyone is offering any of us the Executive Queenship.)
Given my history, beliefs and hopes, I found myself in the
strange position of running through the roster of GOP candidates to see if
there was anyone, anyone, I could vote for in the State Primary this Tuesday. I
want a bland but unifying candidate. I want someone who is a unifier, a
compromiser, a person who understands give and take, and gets things done. I
want a boring moderate, a kind person. I do not need to agree on all their
talking points, I care more about how they work—if they work, that they work
well with others, for others—than what they brashly promise they will do.
I am a Feminist, I am an Environmentalist, I am a Socialist.
I want universal healthcare, I want freedom from religious persecution, I want
global equity, I want a clean planet and an educated, engaged fulfilled
workforce. I want world peace and the right to be left alone. I want taxes
raised and people employed to fix our nations infrastructure. I want abortion
to be safe, legal, rare, and paid for by universal single-payer healthcare. I
want biologically and emotionally grounded sex-education available to everyone.
I want gun use regulated. I want poverty eliminated. I want the stigma of
addiction erased so people aren’t to death embarrassed about needing medical
help for this condition. I want comprehensive action on climate change. I want
us as citizens to stop being such sandy-eyed ostriches about the ways in which
our own daily lives, actions, and insulating choices feed the evils of the
world.
But, more than anything, I want a government that works,
that unites the people, represents our best selves to the world, and takes care
of those who are struggling. And for that, I want not a fiery passionate
presidential candidate who can rally a base, rock the vote, or rattle the
establishment.
I want an adult.
And not just one adult. I want 546 adults: one in the White House,
nine at the Supreme Court, a hundred in the Senate, 535 in the House of
Representatives, and one Vice-President as a security measure.
Further, I’d like this team of people to do their jobs.
Which is to work together to govern these United States. There
are certain responsibilities of each branch of government, things that they can
and cannot do, things that they can only do with the permission of other
branches.
Being the middle of three sisters, my role was not exactly a
peacemaker. I did not mediate between disagreements with a distant sanctity.
Keeping peace and good enough relations with a tripartite of sisters is more a
mutual dance of calculating compromise, a sororial Machiavellianism. I ate
Hannah’s peas so we could all go out for ice cream—if those peas didn’t leave
her plate, I wasn’t getting ice cream either. There is sort of a running score
card of who needs to get her own way today, and who needs to get her only pair
of clean underpants stuck in the freezer on the last day of vacation. The
system breaks down when one person takes up all the airtime with tantrums or
tyrannical blindness or selfish dramatics. The system functions beautifully on
empathy, compromise, and fairness.
Right now, our government is broken. With an even number of
Supreme Court Justices, that branch is wounded, unable to play its full part in
fleshing out the laws that do change people’s lives, that I
non-denominationally pray will pull the arc of history ever more and quickly
towards justice.
And then we have the President, who is in his final months
in office and, while he hasn’t governed with the spark and fire of his 2008
campaign, has done many things I support. But, that is me, a liberal Socialist
from New England with a Masters degree and a fundamental belief in the human
necessity of racial justice. The fact remains that it is difficult, has been
difficult, for President Obama to accomplish much in part because of the
intense opposition of the Republican controlled Congress. I hate to think that
some of this opposition is racially, rather than merely politically motivated,
but I think so nonetheless. Regardless, we are at a point where the Executive
Branch is shorn of the office’s potential.
Meanwhile, the men and women in Congress are so deadlocked that
I suspect a bill to rescue kittens from trees would die on the floor.
Meanwhile, people are dying of gun violence, disease, post-war trauma, and
health problems relating to pollution, and Congress seems as if all it does is
point fingers across the aisle and at the White House and at the Supreme Court
and yell that it is all their fault, they started it, those horrible Wall Street bankers or
Muslims or Women or Christian Fundamentalists or Liberals or Conservatives or
Blacks or Whites or Media Elite or Immigrants or The Patriarchy or Welfare
Dependents or Unions or Abortionists or Jews or LGBTQs or Multinational
Corporations or anyone on Earth who is not me and my little tribe. We are
blameless, we are the saviors, and we will yell the loudest and drum up the
most support and then we will have political clout and when we get to
Washington, we’ll change everything!
Thus, the Legislative Branch yells itself into disfunction.
As for these angry candidates who promise to change
everything, unless we are going to have a major political coup—which is
unlikely given inherent inability within our geography to gather enough True
Believers of any cause to logistically coordinate an effective overthrow—then I
find it difficult to put my faith in anyone’s word about fomenting political
change based on personal ideology and rhetoric.
Nothing will change if we keep electing people who yell more
than listen, who would rather commit seppuku than compromise, who either do not
know the checks and balances and responsibilities and limits and realities of
the offices they seek, or are flagrant liars. A President cannot—without the
cooperation of at least one other branch—build a wall, underwrite college, fund
healthcare, stop cancer, go back to the moon, eliminate ISIS, obliterate
racism, screen all borders for people of a single and beautiful faith, create
jobs, fix dangerous infrastructure, stop climate change, or purify the waters
of our country.
Voting, participating in the political system is not an ala
carte burrito where you personally get to select and approve all the
ingredients. Unless you are running for Dictator of your own country, you will
not love everything about a candidate. You can vote for a person who you
disagree with on some issues. You can vote for a person who you think, given
the realities of the role, would make a good president even if you don’t want
to get a beer with them—odds are, you won’t be having a beer with the
President. You can vote for a person who’s tie or pantsuit or social media
presence or race or gender you aren’t comfortable with—the person and their
abilities to listen and
compromise, balance and unify are what matter.
Along with the U.S. Government 101, we Taylor babies were
tucked in at night with a healthy dose of Robert Frost. One of my mother’s
favorites is from Two Tramps in Mud Time,
which contains this line: My object in living is to unite.
I will vote for anyone and everyone who lives by those
words.
No comments:
Post a Comment